The contract does not clear the system and the bank will not process the payment
Demurrage and storage of the cargo, a missed delivery deadline and a penalty owed to the counterparty; in the worst case the prepayment is stuck abroad.
Typical mistake: The contract was drafted «as usual», without the mandatory sections: the subject matter carries no commodity code under the Foreign Economic Activity Commodity Nomenclature, there is no delivery term, and the payment terms are not spelled out.
The repatriation period was counted from shipment
A sanction payable to the budget calculated on the non-repatriated amount, while the recorded arrears block work under new contracts.
Typical mistake: The 180 days were counted from delivery. The clock starts on the date the non-resident's obligation arises, and only once that period expires does the further period before a sanction applies begin to run.
Customs did not accept the invoice price
Additional duties and value added tax assessed on the difference, a cash gap and an eroded deal margin — on every consignment.
Typical mistake: The transaction value method was declared without assembling the evidence to support it: no export declaration from the country of dispatch, no manufacturer's price list, no proof of payment and no separate breakdown of transport costs.
Goods were imported under your own code for a year, and the audit came later
Retrospective assessment across every consignment plus late-payment interest, with administrative liability for company officers in parallel.
Typical mistake: No advance classification decision was obtained before shipments started and the customs position was never recorded in writing. Post-clearance control examines the whole period, not the current consignment.
The terms of the deal changed and the system was not updated
A mismatch between the contract, the invoice and the data in the system halts both the payment and the release of the goods.
Typical mistake: People assume that only the contract itself is filed. Subsequent documents under the deal are filed too, and any change of terms must be reflected in them.
The contract was signed on the foreign counterparty's template
Terms that are routine in another jurisdiction collide with the mandatory requirements, and the contract has to be re-signed after shipment.
Typical mistake: An English-language supplier template is used without adaptation. The mandatory sections are a requirement as to the form of the contract, not a preference of the bank.