You found a buyer, and your partners challenged the deal
A participant or the company may go to court within three months and demand that the buyer's rights and obligations be transferred to them. The deal is not cancelled — someone else becomes the buyer, at the price you set.
Typical mistake: A verbal «the partners don't mind» is taken for compliance with the procedure. The law requires written notice to the other participants and to the company itself, stating the price and the other terms of sale.
The charter forbids what you have already promised the buyer
If the transaction does not match the form prescribed by law or by the charter, it is invalid. The deposit goes back, time is lost, the buyer walks away.
Typical mistake: Price and timing are agreed before anyone reads the charter. And the charter may require notarisation, forbid sales to third parties or make the company's consent a condition.
Working from a contract written for a repealed law
The templates the market is closing deals with right now are built on Law 310-II of 2001 — it ceased to have effect on 22 July 2026.
Typical mistake: People pull a contract out of last year's folder. ZRU-1137 changed how a share passes, the notification rules and the participants' obligations — a contract on the old rules can be challenged.
The money is in, but you are still in the company
Until the entry is made in the Unified State Register of Business Entities, the seller remains a participant with every obligation attached, including liability to the company and a part in its decisions.
Typical mistake: The deal is treated as closed the moment payment lands, and filing for re-registration is left to the buyer. Title to the share passes when the entry is made in the register.
The buyer walks away after due diligence
Every finding in due diligence is either a discount on the price or the buyer's exit. Hidden liabilities surface at the most expensive moment: once employees and counterparties already know about the deal.
Typical mistake: Sellers prepare from the angle they see themselves: turnover, profit, clients. The buyer looks at three years of tax history, actual headcount against the reporting, licences, land and encumbrances on the share.
The share turns out to be pledged or under a ban on disposal
The deal stalls at the filing stage, when the buyer has already paid and the contract deadlines are running out.
Typical mistake: People forget that the pledge over the share was granted with the general meeting's consent and has never been released, or that a ban on disposal — entered by the participant themselves — is sitting in the state registration system.