Dismissed for misconduct, and the court ordered reinstatement
Reinstatement in the previous position, pay for the entire period of forced absence and compensation for moral damage — plus the employee is back on the payroll.
Typical mistake: No written explanation was requested before the penalty was imposed, or the one-month period from the day the misconduct was discovered was missed. The ground may be watertight while the procedure is already lost.
The whole team on fixed-term contracts “for flexibility”
Every non-renewal turns into an unlawful dismissal with reinstatement and forced absence pay. With a headcount of several dozen this is a systemic risk, not an isolated dispute.
Typical mistake: The fixed-term contract was concluded without a ground provided by the code. Such a contract is deemed concluded for an indefinite term; exceeding the aggregate term of fixed-term contracts gives the same result.
A department was made redundant and the claims followed
Severance pay grows with length of service and reaches two hundred per cent of the average monthly wage, and on top of that come payments for the breached notice period.
Typical mistake: No written notice against signature at least two months in advance, and no offer of a transfer to other available work. Redundancy is a procedure, not a manager's decision.
An employee on sick leave or on holiday was dismissed
The dismissal is set aside regardless of how well founded the ground was.
Typical mistake: The employee's status on the date of the order was not checked. The law expressly prohibits termination at the employer's initiative during incapacity for work, leave and business trips.
There are no HR documents, and an inspection has arrived
Any labour dispute becomes a dispute without evidence: the employer has no orders, no signed acknowledgements and no record of the procedure.
Typical mistake: HR is run “as it goes”: there is a contract and nothing else. Meanwhile the conclusion, amendment and termination of an employment contract are subject to mandatory registration in the state information system.
Working from templates written for the old code
The wording of orders and contracts refers to rules that no longer exist, and that is the first thing the employee's representative uses.
Typical mistake: It was overlooked that the Labour Code now in force was adopted in 2022 while the 1995 code was repealed. Both the grounds for termination and the procedures have changed.