The status is lost over an overdue audit report
Removal of the status cancels the application of the exemptions and restores the obligation to pay them into the State Budget — for a period that has already passed.
Typical mistake: The annual mandatory audit and the filing of documents with the Directorate are treated as a formality and put off. This is the most frequent ground for removal of the status, not a dispute about the nature of the company's activity.
The company does work that is not in its business plan
A mismatch between actual activity and the activities in the List is a standalone ground for removal of the status, with all the consequences that has for the exemptions.
Typical mistake: An adjacent project is taken on because “it is IT too”, without a new or supplementary business plan approved by the Directorate. A resident must carry out exclusively the activities specified in the substantiated business plan in accordance with the List.
A foreign client paid late
A resident must ensure repatriation of assets under foreign trade transactions; missing the deadlines carries sanctions calculated as a percentage of the non-repatriated amount, and they grow with the length of the delay.
Typical mistake: People assume that because the service has been delivered and the client will pay sooner or later, there is no currency risk. The duty to ensure repatriation rests with the resident, not with the client.
The export contract was signed on the client's template
Failing to meet the requirements for a foreign trade contract, and entering its data into the information system incorrectly, is treated as a breach of the established procedure for export and import transactions.
Typical mistake: MSAs and SOWs are signed on the client's American or European template. Yet mandatory sections are prescribed for a foreign trade contract, and information on the export of services is entered into the information system for foreign trade transactions.
The company assumes it owns its own code
During diligence for a sale of the company or a funding round it emerges that the rights are not documented the way the investor assumed. That stops the deal.
Typical mistake: There is no agreement on works made in the course of employment with in-house developers, and contracts with contractors do not say that the rights pass as exclusive: under the law, rights transferred under an author's agreement are deemed non-exclusive unless the agreement expressly provides otherwise.
“The exemptions have been extended to 2040”
After 1 January 2028 the regime is different: the exemption then applies without value added tax and subject to a condition on the share of exports in total income.
Typical mistake: The financial model is built on an open-ended zero tax burden. The design has two stages, and moving between them changes both the rate and the VAT obligation.
A foreign specialist left and the IT-visa was forgotten
The IT-visa exists as a consequence of the Directorate's recommendation: when it ceases to be valid, the consequences reach the holder's family members as well.
Typical mistake: The IT-visa is treated as a standalone document. It is issued on the basis of a recommendation (IT-Card) from the Technopark Directorate, and it terminates early when the grounds listed in the Regulation arise.